Ford Fusion MOT Results

Registered in 2009
74.3% pass rate
from 8,941 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fusion is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.034% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.067% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.011% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.034% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.011% fail on Battery
    • 0.011% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.011% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.011% fail on Lamp
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (16% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.96% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.022% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Front
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Location
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.034% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Front drive shafts (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Front suspension joints (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.022% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.022% fail on Condition
    • 0.022% fail on Macpherson strut (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.011% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.6% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Components (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Hoses
        • 0.022% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.089% fail on Leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Operation
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake pads (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.011% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.92% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Front wheels (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Rear wheels (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake imbalance (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.26% fail on ABS
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.056% fail on Pedal
        • 0.045% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 1.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.078% fail on Fuel system (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on System
      • 0.022% fail on Cap
      • 0.011% fail on Hose
  • 0.59% fail on Steering (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Steering system (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.011% fail on Other components
        • 0.011% fail on Steering component
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
      • 0.011% fail on Drive system
      • 0.011% fail on Rams
    • 0.011% fail on Steering control
      • 0.011% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.011% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.30% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.078% fail on Drivers
      • 0.022% fail on Passengers
    • 0.089% fail on Body condition
    • 0.078% fail on Engine mountings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Doors (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.011% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.011% fail on Chassis
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate (44% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Attachment (64% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Requirements
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.034% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Ford Fusion (2002 - 2012)
    Versatile interior. Easy to get in and out of. Reasonably sized load area with no lip. Four-star crash test rating, economical TDCI diesels.

    Search Good Garages