Ford Fusion MOT Results
Registered in 200249.0% pass rate
from 935 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fusion is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(31% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.75% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.32% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.32% fail on Position lamp
- 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.21% fail on Horn
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Springs
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.5% fail on Coil spring
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints (76% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (62% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Axles
- 0.32% fail on Axle (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.32% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.32% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.32% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(25% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(51% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
- 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (89% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.75% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.75% fail on Brake discs
-
0.21% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.21% fail on Cable
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.64% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.43% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.43% fail on Brake fluid
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(51% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(35% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(37% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(49% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.21% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.32% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.11% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(49% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.21% fail on Other leaks
-
9.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(37% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 4.5% fail on Washers
-
0.32% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.4% fail on Tread depth
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Size/type
-
6.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Transmission
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.1% fail on Joints
- 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.11% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.11% fail on Joints
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.43% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.11% fail on System
-
0.32% fail on
Body
- 0.32% fail on Other body component
-
0.32% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.21% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.11% fail on
Chassis
- 0.11% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.11% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Pump
-
0.64% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.64% fail on Steering rack
-
0.43% fail on
Steering play
- 0.43% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(55% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.86% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.11% fail on Registration plates
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.11% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Fusion (2002 - 2012)
Versatile interior. Easy to get in and out of. Reasonably sized load area with no lip. Four-star crash test rating, economical TDCI diesels.