Ford Fiesta MOT Results
Registered in 200051.4% pass rate
from 3,300 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fiesta is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(64% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (39% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.091% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.030% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (76% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Springs
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.2% fail on Coil spring
- 0.030% fail on Mounting
- 0.091% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.0% fail on
Axles
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Axle
- 0.030% fail on Stub axle
-
1.8% fail on
Sub-frames
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Sub-frame
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.82% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.73% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint
-
0.061% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.030% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.030% fail on Suspension unit
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(26% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(200% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(200% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.15% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.030% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.030% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.061% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.091% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.091% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (88% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(32% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.82% fail on Brake discs
-
0.73% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(48% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.12% fail on Cable
- 0.030% fail on Lever
-
0.82% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.39% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.30% fail on Lever
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Hand lever
- 0.091% fail on Pedal
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.061% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.15% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.091% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.15% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(91% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (90% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.091% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.061% fail on Other components
-
0.030% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.030% fail on Other braking system component
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(62% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Drive shaft (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.33% fail on Joints
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Strengthening plate
-
1.8% fail on
Chassis
(79% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Chassis condition (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Other body component (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Body condition
-
0.82% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Pipe
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.030% fail on Hose
-
0.48% fail on
Doors
-
0.21% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.091% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.091% fail on Door condition
-
0.21% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.24% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.091% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.18% fail on Bumpers
- 0.15% fail on Floor
-
0.15% fail on
Cabs
- 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.091% fail on
Spare wheel
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Carrier
- 0.030% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.091% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.061% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.030% fail on Bracket
-
0.030% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.030% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.030% fail on Passenger compartment
-
6.7% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Visibility
(29% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Washers (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
View to rear
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
- 0.030% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.21% fail on Bonnet
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
- 0.030% fail on Driver's view
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(32% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(42% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.030% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.73% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(47% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.030% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.030% fail on Switch
-
0.42% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Electrical equipment
(79% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Battery(ies) (81% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.030% fail on Horn
-
0.061% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.061% fail on Position lamp
-
0.061% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.030% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.030% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.030% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.030% fail on Switch
-
9.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Attachment
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.030% fail on
Airbags
- 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
(33% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.45% fail on Size/type (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(39% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(37% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (41% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.12% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.30% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.030% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.030% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(37% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.030% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.030% fail on Other leaks
-
0.030% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.030% fail on Undertray
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.70% fail on
Steering
(82% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Steering gear
(82% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack (81% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Power steering
- 0.061% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.030% fail on Operation
- 0.030% fail on Pump
- 0.030% fail on Other components
- 0.030% fail on Steering column
-
0.36% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.091% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Fiesta (2000 - 2002)
1995 Fiesta faclifted. Retained much improved handling and decent engines.