Ford Explorer MOT Results
Registered in 200062.1% pass rate
from 145 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Explorer is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (59 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.69% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
- 2.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 2.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (41 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.69% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.69% fail on
Rbt
- 0.69% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.69% fail on
Rbt
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 4.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.69% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.4% fail on Lever
-
0.69% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.69% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.69% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.69% fail on Suspension arm
-
6.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.4% fail on
Springs
-
2.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(254 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Shackle bracket (619 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(254 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.4% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
-
3.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.1% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.1% fail on
Chassis
- 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Cabs
(17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.69% fail on Tank
- 0.69% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.69% fail on
Transmission
-
0.69% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.69% fail on Joints
-
0.69% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.69% fail on
Body
- 0.69% fail on Other body component
-
0.69% fail on
Seats
- 0.69% fail on Driver's seat
-
2.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
7.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 0.69% fail on Wipers
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
-
0.69% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.69% fail on Steering rack
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates
-
1.4% fail on
Tyres
- 0.69% fail on Condition
- 0.69% fail on Tread depth