Ford Explorer MOT Results
Registered in 199957.8% pass rate
from 258 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Explorer is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(59% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels
- 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.2% fail on
Components
- 3.5% fail on Pipes
- 1.9% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Hoses
-
6.2% fail on
Components
-
3.9% fail on
Hub components
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.39% fail on Brake calipers
- 2.3% fail on ABS
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
0.78% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.78% fail on
Pedal
- 0.78% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Pedal
-
0.39% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.39% fail on Linkage
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(59% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.3% fail on Front lamps
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.39% fail on All position lamps
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Tell tale
- 3.5% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.78% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.39% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
0.39% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(35% better than other 1999 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.6% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.78% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.78% fail on Attachment
-
3.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(62% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting
- 0.39% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(121 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Anchor bracket (503 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Shackle bracket (755 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Front
-
0.78% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.3% fail on Emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Cap
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 0.78% fail on Windscreen
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
-
7.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Attachment
-
0.78% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.78% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.1% fail on Body condition
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Chassis
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
- 0.78% fail on Drivers
- 0.78% fail on Passengers other
- 0.39% fail on Passengers front
-
0.39% fail on
Seats
- 0.39% fail on Passengers
-
3.9% fail on
Tyres
(53% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(74% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
- 0.78% fail on Track rod end
- 0.39% fail on Steering rack
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate