Ford Explorer MOT Results
Registered in 199859.0% pass rate
from 266 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Explorer is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 11% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Front wheels
- 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.75% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.38% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.38% fail on Gradient hand brake
-
6.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.6% fail on
Components
- 4.1% fail on Pipes
- 0.75% fail on Hoses
- 0.75% fail on Valves
- 1.5% fail on Leaks
-
5.6% fail on
Components
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 1.9% fail on ABS
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.75% fail on
Pedal
- 0.75% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Pedal
-
0.38% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.38% fail on Linkage
- 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.0% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.8% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Tell tale
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.75% fail on Tell tales (19 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.1% fail on Lamp (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.75% fail on Headlamp
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
4.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(60% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting (64% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.38% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.75% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.38% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.38% fail on Spring eye
-
0.38% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.38% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.38% fail on Rear
-
0.38% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.38% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.38% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.38% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
4.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.1% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Cap (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 1998 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.75% fail on Windscreen
-
6.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.8% fail on Body condition
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Chassis
-
0.75% fail on
Seats
- 0.75% fail on Drivers
-
0.38% fail on
Doors
- 0.38% fail on Passengers other
-
4.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.38% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.38% fail on Steering rack
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.75% fail on Other components
- 0.38% fail on Operation
- 0.38% fail on Steering operation
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate