Ford Explorer MOT Results
Registered in 199856.8% pass rate
from 125 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Explorer is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(86% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (34 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.80% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (22 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
-
8.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Hand lever
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.6% fail on Lever
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.80% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.80% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.80% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.80% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.80% fail on Brake pads
-
0.80% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.80% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.80% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(86% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.80% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.80% fail on Linkage
-
2.4% fail on
Other suspension component
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint
-
0.80% fail on
Springs
-
0.80% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.80% fail on Shackle bracket
-
0.80% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.80% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
4.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.4% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.80% fail on Horn
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.80% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.80% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.80% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
8.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Body
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Other body component (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Mounting fixings
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.80% fail on
Chassis
- 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.80% fail on
Seats
- 0.80% fail on Driver's seat
-
7.2% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Washers
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
-
6.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 2.4% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint
-
0.80% fail on
Power steering
- 0.80% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Road Wheels
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
- 0.80% fail on Condition
- 0.80% fail on Tread depth