Ford Escort MOT Results
Registered in 200257.4% pass rate
from 533 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Escort is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Springs
- 3.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (36 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Leaf springs
(123 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Anchor bracket (744 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Coil springs
(84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.19% fail on Linkage
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.94% fail on Ball joint
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.94% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.38% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.19% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(92% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
(97% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
(97% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.38% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(92% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Load sensing valves (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
0.56% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.56% fail on Cable
-
0.38% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake pads (79% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.56% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.56% fail on Pedal
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.38% fail on Lever
-
0.38% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.38% fail on Valves (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.19% fail on Other components
-
0.19% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.19% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.19% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.19% fail on Dipswitch
-
2.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.38% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.38% fail on Position lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.38% fail on Switch
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(44% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.9% fail on Joints
-
0.56% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.56% fail on Joints
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Sub-frame
(12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame condition (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Hose (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Pipe
- 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Body
- 0.56% fail on Panel
- 0.38% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Seats
- 0.19% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.19% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.19% fail on Carrier
-
0.19% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.19% fail on Bracket
-
0.19% fail on
Doors
-
0.19% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.19% fail on Door condition
-
0.19% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.19% fail on
Cabs
- 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
0.75% fail on
Condition of glass
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Windscreen (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
View to rear
- 0.38% fail on Mirrors
-
6.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.94% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.19% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.19% fail on Catalytic converter
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.56% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Steering linkage components
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.38% fail on Steering rack
-
0.38% fail on
Power steering
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Pump
- 0.19% fail on Other components
-
0.75% fail on
Steering linkage components
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.75% fail on Registration plates
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment