Ford Escort MOT Results
Registered in 200054.6% pass rate
from 824 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Escort is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(70% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.73% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.0% fail on
Springs
-
2.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.2% fail on Coil spring
- 0.73% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.12% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.12% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
2.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.12% fail on Linkage
-
1.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
-
0.12% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(78% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
(97% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.12% fail on Joints
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Chassis
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.97% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Body condition (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.73% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.24% fail on Tank
- 0.12% fail on System
- 0.61% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Seats
- 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.12% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.12% fail on
Doors
-
0.12% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
-
0.12% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
(97% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
9.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
- 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.12% fail on Brake drums
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.24% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.24% fail on Cable
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.24% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.24% fail on Valves (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Pedal
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.12% fail on Lever
-
0.12% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.12% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
9.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(58% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.49% fail on Horn
-
0.73% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.73% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.73% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Switch
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.9% fail on
Visibility
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
-
0.49% fail on
View to rear
- 0.49% fail on Mirrors
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
7.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(82% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.9% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.61% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.36% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.12% fail on Other leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.61% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.24% fail on Drag link end
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
-
0.97% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.97% fail on Steering rack
-
0.61% fail on
Power steering
- 0.49% fail on Other components
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.12% fail on
Steering play
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.85% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.61% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
-
0.73% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.12% fail on Anchorages