Ford Cortina MOT Results
Registered in 198276.8% pass rate
from 237 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1982 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Cortina is unusually good or bad.
-
8.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.42% fail on Horn
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.84% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.42% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.84% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.42% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.42% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.84% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.42% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.42% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.42% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.1% fail on
Chassis
- 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.84% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.84% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.84% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.42% fail on Pipe
- 0.42% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.42% fail on Bumpers
- 0.42% fail on Floor
-
0.42% fail on
Seats
- 0.42% fail on Passenger's seat
-
2.1% fail on
Chassis
-
4.6% fail on
Brakes
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.42% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.42% fail on Brake fluid
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Washers
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.42% fail on Requirements
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.84% fail on
Steering
-
0.84% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.84% fail on Steering rack
-
0.84% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.84% fail on
Tyres
- 0.84% fail on Condition
-
0.42% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates