Ford C-MAX MOT Results
Registered in 200855.7% pass rate
from 16,274 tests in 2021
(7.7% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford C-MAX is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover (29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Suspension arm (44% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.3% fail on
Springs
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.3% fail on Coil spring
- 0.012% fail on Mounting
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(18% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Linkage ball joints (40% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (62% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Anti-roll bar (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.049% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers (21% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.23% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0061% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Sub-frames
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Sub-frame (74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.025% fail on
Macpherson strut
(89% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.0061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.025% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.012% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.0061% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
-
0.018% fail on
Axles
(91% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (90% better than other 2008 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
(44% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp (50% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device (74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (56% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (15% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (67% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.012% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.88% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.0061% fail on Switch
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.50% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0061% fail on All position lamps
- 0.0061% fail on Switch
-
0.11% fail on
Electrical equipment
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Battery(ies) (83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.055% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.049% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.0061% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.0061% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
(44% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Tyres
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Condition (72% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Tread depth (13% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Size/type (45% better than other 2008 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Brakes
(21% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Brake linings
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.10% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.068% fail on Cable
- 0.018% fail on Linkage
- 0.012% fail on Lever
- 0.0061% fail on Pivot
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (30% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance (45% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0061% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0061% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0061% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.0061% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
(27% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt
(26% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Parking brake performance (21% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.018% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.012% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0061% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0061% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0061% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt
(26% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance (51% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.012% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.012% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Brake performance not tested (55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.48% fail on Electronic stability control (79% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system (57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(50% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pedal
- 0.080% fail on Hand lever (65% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake control
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Lever (58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0061% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.092% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.031% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Brake fluid (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0061% fail on Valves
- 0.018% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0061% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(19% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Transmission
(64% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Joints (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Drive shaft (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Flexible couplings (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Driver's seat (73% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.080% fail on Tank
- 0.012% fail on Pipe
- 0.0061% fail on System
-
0.092% fail on
Body
- 0.061% fail on Other body component
- 0.025% fail on Panel
- 0.0061% fail on Body condition
-
0.092% fail on
Doors
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Front passenger's door
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Door condition (70% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Other passenger's door
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Door condition (78% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Door condition (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Catch
- 0.0061% fail on Hinge
-
0.037% fail on
Front passenger's door
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Undertray (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Bumpers (56% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.031% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.012% fail on Bracket
-
0.031% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.031% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.018% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(93% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (92% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Chassis
(90% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Chassis condition (89% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0061% fail on Coupling
- 0.0061% fail on Passenger compartment
-
4.5% fail on
Transmission
(64% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Steering
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Steering gear
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Steering rack (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Operation
- 0.0061% fail on Steering box
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Track rod end (54% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Drag link end
-
0.018% fail on
Other components
- 0.012% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.0061% fail on Steering component
- 0.018% fail on Locking devices
- 0.012% fail on Steering arm
-
0.41% fail on
Power steering
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Operation
- 0.043% fail on Rams (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.025% fail on Pump (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Steering play
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
- 0.043% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.012% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.0061% fail on Flexible coupling
- 0.0061% fail on Universal joint
- 0.0061% fail on Steering column
- 0.0061% fail on Steering lock
-
5.0% fail on
Steering gear
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Washers (21% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
-
0.14% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.012% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.092% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.086% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0061% fail on Window
- 0.012% fail on Driver's view
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(21% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(20% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (39% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.037% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.0061% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0061% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.50% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (38% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.018% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.0061% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0061% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fluid leaks
(51% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.025% fail on Other leaks
- 0.018% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.043% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.025% fail on Undertray
- 0.018% fail on Sound deadening material
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(20% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas (75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Attachment
- 0.0061% fail on Requirements
- 0.18% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0061% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.53% fail on Attachment
- 0.037% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.52% fail on Registration plates
-
0.012% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.012% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0061% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0061% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford C-MAX (2003 - 2010)
Best entry and egress of any car anywhere. Excellent front seat comfort.