Ford B-Max MOT Results
Registered in 201685.1% pass rate
from 7,294 tests in 2021
(9.3% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford B-Max is unusually good or bad.
-
7.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(99% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Headlamp aim
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.75% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.26% fail on
Headlamps
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.22% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.055% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.055% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.055% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.014% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.014% fail on Position lamp
-
0.014% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
-
2.3% fail on
Tyres
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Size/type
-
1.7% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(28% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.014% fail on Brake linings
-
0.15% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Brake discs (68% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.15% fail on
Brake performance
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Rbt
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.027% fail on Service brake performance (92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Rbt
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.014% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt
- 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt
-
0.082% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.082% fail on Lever
- 0.069% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.027% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.027% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.027% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.014% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.014% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.014% fail on Hand lever
-
0.014% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.014% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.014% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(28% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Visibility
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Wipers (68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Washers (67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
View to rear
- 0.082% fail on Mirrors
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.29% fail on
Suspension arms
(42% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.041% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.014% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.014% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(36% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.62% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.069% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.41% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.70% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.014% fail on Sound deadening material
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(36% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Steering
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Other components
- 0.014% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.041% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.041% fail on Steering rack
-
0.014% fail on
Steering play
- 0.014% fail on Steering rack
-
0.69% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.014% fail on Requirements
- 0.027% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.041% fail on
Transmission
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Body
- 0.027% fail on Other body component
-
0.014% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.014% fail on Tank
-
0.014% fail on
Seats
- 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.014% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.014% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.11% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.11% fail on Registration plates
-
0.096% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
- 0.014% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford B-MAX (2012 - 2017)
Sliding side doors and no central pillar mean unimpeded access. Five star Euro NCAP rating. Engines include 1.0 litre three-cylinder EcoBoost petrol. Decent drive.