FIAT Tipo MOT Results
Registered in 201775.5% pass rate
from 6,264 tests in 2021
(90% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Tipo is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.080% fail on Windscreen
-
0.080% fail on
View to rear
- 0.080% fail on Mirrors
- 0.048% fail on Bonnet
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
(50% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.064% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Ball joint (24 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Linkage
- 0.016% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
1.4% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.016% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Brake linings
-
0.88% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(160% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.016% fail on Cable
- 0.016% fail on Lever
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
- 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.064% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.096% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.064% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.032% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.032% fail on
Rbt
- 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.032% fail on
Rbt
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Pedal
-
0.096% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.048% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.032% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.032% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.048% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.73% fail on Headlamp (72% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Direction indicators
(82% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Flashing type
(82% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Side repeaters (84% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.032% fail on All direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Flashing type
(82% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.19% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.048% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.048% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.032% fail on Horn
- 0.016% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.016% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.016% fail on Position lamp
-
0.016% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.016% fail on Switch
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.45% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.032% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Doors
(19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Door condition (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Driver's door
(52 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Door condition (60 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.016% fail on Bumpers
-
0.016% fail on
Body
- 0.016% fail on Other body component
- 0.016% fail on Undertray
-
0.67% fail on
Doors
(19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.048% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.032% fail on Condition
-
0.080% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.080% fail on Registration plates
-
0.064% fail on
Steering
-
0.048% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.032% fail on Track rod end
- 0.016% fail on Steering arm
-
0.016% fail on
Steering play
- 0.016% fail on Steering rack
-
0.048% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Tipo (2016 - 2024)
Good value in the right specification. Decent interior space.