MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Tipo » 2016

FIAT Tipo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
78.2% pass rate
from 1,198 tests in 2021
(34% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Tipo is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.4% fail on Visibility (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.083% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.083% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.083% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.083% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.083% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.083% fail on Rbt
          • 0.083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.083% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 4.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.083% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.83% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.83% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.67% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.083% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.67% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.17% fail on Position lamps (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Position lamp (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.083% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.083% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.083% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension
    • 0.83% fail on Wheel bearings (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Springs
      • 0.67% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.67% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.083% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.083% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.92% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.75% fail on Doors (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's door (30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Front passenger's door (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.083% fail on Body
      • 0.083% fail on Other body component
  • 0.33% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment
    • 0.083% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.25% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Steering
    • 0.083% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.083% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.083% fail on Steering play
      • 0.083% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.083% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.083% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages