FIAT Stilo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
46.1% pass rate
from 1,254 tests in 2017
(20% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Stilo is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 16% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual lamps (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Switch (89 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamps (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.080% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps (29% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Battery
    • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Fog lamp (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.080% fail on Switch
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.080% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.080% fail on Switch
  • 30% fail on Suspension (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Coil springs (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Condition (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Location
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.16% fail on Couplings (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on Trailing arms (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.72% fail on Front
      • 0.40% fail on Rear
    • 0.64% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.32% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Bonded suspension (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.080% fail on Condition
      • 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Axles
      • 0.080% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.080% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.080% fail on General condition
    • 0.080% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.080% fail on Condition
    • 0.080% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.080% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.9% fail on Hub components (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Components (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Hoses
        • 0.56% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.32% fail on Leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.32% fail on Cable
      • 0.24% fail on Lever (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on ABS
    • 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.080% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.080% fail on Pedal
        • 0.080% fail on Condition
    • 0.080% fail on Locking devices
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Emissions (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.40% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Cap
      • 0.080% fail on System
  • 11% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.8% fail on Condition (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.080% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.4% fail on Steering (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering system (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.080% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.72% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers
    • 0.56% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Passengers
    • 0.32% fail on Body condition
    • 0.24% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.24% fail on Chassis
    • 0.080% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.080% fail on Body security
    • 0.080% fail on Load security
      • 0.080% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.080% fail on Requirements
    • 0.48% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.96% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.080% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages