FIAT Stilo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.1% pass rate
from 499 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Stilo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Headlamp aim (87% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Headlamp aim (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 7.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.20% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 24% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (99% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Suspension arm
    • 8.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.4% fail on Springs
      • 4.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.2% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.20% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Axle (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.80% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.80% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 16% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Airbags (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers airbag (61 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.60% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.60% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.60% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (59% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.80% fail on Lever
    • 0.80% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.60% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.80% fail on Chassis
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.20% fail on System
    • 0.80% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.40% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.40% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.40% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.40% fail on Undertray
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.20% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.20% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 5.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 4.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.80% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Electronic power steering (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Steering play
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.20% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages