FIAT Seicento MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.7% pass rate
from 1,837 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Seicento is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Components (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 11% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.054% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Mechanical components (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Cable
      • 0.11% fail on Lever
      • 0.054% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.054% fail on Pivot
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
        • 0.054% fail on Condition
        • 0.054% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.054% fail on ABS
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (12% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.76% fail on Rear lamps (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.054% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Horn
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
      • 0.054% fail on Lamp
  • 15% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.054% fail on Couplings
        • 0.054% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Front
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Coil springs (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.44% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.38% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.054% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Washers (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.054% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (35% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Cap (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (33% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.76% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (52% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.60% fail on Body condition
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers
    • 0.38% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis
    • 0.33% fail on Engine mountings (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.054% fail on Tailgate
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering system (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.054% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
  • 0.33% fail on Registration plates and VIN (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate (71% better than other 2002 cars)

Search Good Garages