MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Seicento » 2000

FIAT Seicento MOT Results

Registered in 2000
50.4% pass rate
from 349 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Seicento is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.86% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.57% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.57% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.57% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 14% fail on Headlamp aim (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.57% fail on Horn
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Visibility (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.86% fail on Doors
      • 0.57% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
    • 0.57% fail on Chassis
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's seat
  • 10% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.57% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.57% fail on Sub-frame
  • 9.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.86% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Size/type
  • 0.86% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.86% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.86% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages