FIAT Sedici MOT Results

Registered in 2008
59.9% pass rate
from 541 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Sedici is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 8.1% fail on Springs (71% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Coil springs (72% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Coil spring (73% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.55% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.74% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (29 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (52 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.18% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.74% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.55% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.18% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.74% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (53% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Transmission (78% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Joints
      • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.55% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.37% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
  • 0.37% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages