FIAT Qubo MOT Results
Registered in 201267.9% pass rate
from 949 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(60% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
12% fail on
Springs
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
12% fail on
Coil springs
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 12% fail on Coil spring (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
12% fail on
Coil springs
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.63% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.63% fail on
Macpherson strut
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.63% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.21% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Other suspension component (25 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
-
12% fail on
Springs
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
4.7% fail on
Brakes
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.53% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.32% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.53% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(75% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Brake pads (74% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.32% fail on Hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Pedal
-
0.42% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.32% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.32% fail on Lever
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.95% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.95% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.84% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.95% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.84% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.42% fail on
Headlamps
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.42% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
0.42% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.6% fail on
Visibility
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.21% fail on Bonnet
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
3.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.95% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.95% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.11% fail on System
-
0.21% fail on
Transmission
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Panel
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
-
0.11% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.11% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.11% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.95% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Requirements
- 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.74% fail on
Steering
-
0.42% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Track rod end
-
0.21% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.11% fail on Other components
- 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.42% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.11% fail on Registration plates
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Condition