FIAT Qubo MOT Results
Registered in 201066.5% pass rate
from 659 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.76% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.46% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.46% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.46% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.30% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.30% fail on Front suspension joints
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Condition (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth
-
7.0% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(48% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.76% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.1% fail on Front lamps
- 0.91% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Headlamps
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Battery
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.15% fail on Switch
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.2% fail on Wipers (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.30% fail on Windscreen
-
3.5% fail on
Brakes
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.46% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.76% fail on Front wheels
- 0.30% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Brake imbalance
-
0.76% fail on
Service brake control components
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Pedal
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Anti-slip (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Pedal
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.15% fail on
Components
- 0.15% fail on Hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Components
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
- 0.61% fail on Steering operation (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Power steering
(9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Operation (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Rams
-
0.30% fail on
Steering system
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Steering arm
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.61% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.61% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.30% fail on System
- 0.15% fail on Hose
- 0.15% fail on Cap
- 0.30% fail on Emissions
-
0.91% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.76% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.46% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.15% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.76% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.30% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.30% fail on Registration plate