FIAT Qubo MOT Results

Registered in 2010

58.4% pass rate

from 721 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Suspension
- 11% fail on Springs (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 11% fail on Coil springs (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 11% fail on Coil spring (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.1% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.28% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.28% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
  - 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint
10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.9% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  - 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.55% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
6.9% fail on Brakes
- 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.5% fail on Brake discs
  - 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 2.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.1% fail on Rbt
      - 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.14% fail on Rbt
      - 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.97% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.83% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.28% fail on Lever
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
6.5% fail on Tyres
- 4.4% fail on Condition
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
6.4% fail on Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 0.42% fail on View to rear
  - 0.42% fail on Mirrors
- 0.14% fail on Bonnet
- 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.14% fail on Windscreen
5.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.9% fail on Fuel system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Tank (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.83% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.97% fail on Transmission
  - 0.97% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.97% fail on Joints
- 0.55% fail on Doors
  - 0.42% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.28% fail on Door condition
    - 0.14% fail on Catch
  - 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.14% fail on Door condition
- 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Body
  - 0.28% fail on Other body component
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers
- 0.14% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.14% fail on Load security
  - 0.14% fail on Loading door
4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.42% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Other leaks
1.9% fail on Steering
- 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.42% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.28% fail on Operation (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Steering rack
- 0.28% fail on Power steering
  - 0.28% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on Seat belts (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.14% fail on Requirements
- 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates
0.42% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Attachment