FIAT Qubo MOT Results

Registered in 2010

63.3% pass rate

from 763 tests in 2020

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.

15% fail on Suspension (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 8.7% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 8.7% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (59% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.92% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.79% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
8.8% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 4.3% fail on Condition
8.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.7% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.79% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.52% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Horn
- 0.26% fail on Position lamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Position lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
5.8% fail on Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 0.26% fail on View to rear
  - 0.26% fail on Mirrors
- 0.13% fail on Driver's view
5.5% fail on Brakes
- 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.92% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.92% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.13% fail on Cable
    - 0.13% fail on Lever
- 2.5% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.0% fail on Rbt
      - 0.92% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.52% fail on Rbt
      - 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.66% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.66% fail on Lever
- 0.39% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.26% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    - 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  - 1.6% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.92% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.66% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.66% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.92% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Tank (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  - 0.13% fail on System
- 0.52% fail on Transmission
  - 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.52% fail on Joints
- 0.26% fail on Doors
  - 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.13% fail on Door condition
  - 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.13% fail on Door condition
1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.3% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
1.3% fail on Steering
- 0.79% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.66% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.26% fail on Steering rack
- 0.26% fail on Power steering
  - 0.13% fail on Rams
  - 0.13% fail on Other components
0.39% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.39% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates