FIAT Qubo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.9% pass rate
from 613 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Springs (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Coil springs (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Coil spring (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.98% fail on Suspension arms (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.49% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.49% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (68% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.49% fail on Condition of glass (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.33% fail on Spark ignition (84% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.82% fail on Transmission
      • 0.82% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.82% fail on Joints
    • 0.49% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.98% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages