FIAT Qubo MOT Results

Registered in 2009

55.2% pass rate

from 536 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.

21% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 10% fail on Springs (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 10% fail on Coil springs (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 9.9% fail on Coil spring (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Mounting
- 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.93% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.19% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.1% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.1% fail on Headlamp
- 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.7% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Horn
  - 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.37% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.19% fail on All position lamps
  - 0.19% fail on Position lamp
- 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.37% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.37% fail on Reversing lamps
7.1% fail on Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 3.5% fail on Condition
6.3% fail on Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 0.56% fail on View to rear
  - 0.56% fail on Mirrors
- 0.19% fail on Bonnet
- 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.19% fail on Windscreen
6.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.3% fail on Transmission
  - 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
    - 1.1% fail on Joints
  - 0.19% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.19% fail on Joints
- 1.1% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Body
  - 0.37% fail on Other body component
- 0.37% fail on Seats
  - 0.37% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
- 0.19% fail on Boot lid
  - 0.19% fail on Boot lid condition
4.7% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.5% fail on Rbt
      - 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.19% fail on Rbt
      - 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.93% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.93% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.75% fail on Brake discs
- 0.56% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.56% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.37% fail on Lever
- 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.19% fail on Pedal
- 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
4.3% fail on Steering (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.6% fail on Track rod end
- 1.1% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Power steering (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.75% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.37% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.19% fail on Other leaks
2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.56% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.56% fail on Registration plates
0.19% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment