FIAT Qubo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
62.2% pass rate
from 547 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Qubo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 10% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Location (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.91% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.91% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.73% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.73% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.37% fail on All position lamps (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.73% fail on Horn
    • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.37% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Condition
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 6.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.8% fail on Washers (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Components
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Tank (53 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on System
    • 0.73% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.37% fail on Emissions
    • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 0.55% fail on Steering system
      • 0.37% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Operation (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Steering control (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Steering lock (123 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.73% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.55% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.37% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.18% fail on Load security
      • 0.18% fail on Bootlid

Search Good Garages