FIAT Punto MOT Results
Registered in 201781.0% pass rate
from 1,269 tests in 2021
(49% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.
-
9.4% fail on
Visibility
(150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers
-
0.079% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.079% fail on Windscreen
-
6.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(150% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Reversing lamps
(10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.32% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.079% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.32% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.32% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.32% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Brakes
-
0.55% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(68% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Brake pads (68% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.24% fail on Brake discs
-
0.39% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(68% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
- 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.079% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.079% fail on
Rbt
- 0.079% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.079% fail on
Rbt
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.55% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension
-
0.95% fail on
Springs
(180% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Coil springs
(180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Coil springs
(180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.079% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.079% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.95% fail on
Springs
(180% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.079% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.55% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.16% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Doors
-
0.079% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.079% fail on Door condition
-
0.079% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.079% fail on
Seats
- 0.079% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.079% fail on Undertray
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
-
0.079% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.079% fail on Steering rack
-
0.079% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.079% fail on Track rod end
-
0.079% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.079% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.079% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.079% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.079% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Punto (2010 - 2018)
Low running costs. Economical engines. Reasonable levels of standard kit.