FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.6% pass rate
from 1,767 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.23% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.057% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.057% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.057% fail on Daytime running lamps
    • 0.057% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.057% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (72% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (79% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.6% fail on Brakes
    • 0.79% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.057% fail on Rbt
          • 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Mechanical brake components (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake linings and pads (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake pads (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.11% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.057% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.057% fail on Lever
    • 0.057% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.057% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.057% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 0.51% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.45% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.45% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.057% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.057% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.057% fail on Body
      • 0.057% fail on Panel
    • 0.057% fail on Load security
      • 0.057% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.057% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.057% fail on Attachment
  • 0.057% fail on Steering
    • 0.057% fail on Power steering
      • 0.057% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.057% fail on Suspension
    • 0.057% fail on Springs
      • 0.057% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.057% fail on Coil spring
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Punto (2010 - 2018)
    Low running costs thanks to economical engines. Impressive MultiAir petrols. Good levels of standard kit. Comes with a driver's knee airbag and five three point seatbelts.

    Search Good Garages