FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2016

78.4% pass rate

from 1,743 tests in 2021

(30% worse than other 2016 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

9.3% fail on Visibility (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Wipers (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 0.057% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.057% fail on Windscreen
- 0.057% fail on View to rear
  - 0.057% fail on Mirrors
7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.63% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.46% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.46% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.34% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.23% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps
2.9% fail on Tyres
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
2.6% fail on Brakes
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance
  - 0.80% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.80% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.40% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      - 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      - 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.34% fail on Rbt
      - 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.057% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (46% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Brake linings and pads (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.69% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.34% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.34% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.057% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.057% fail on Cable
- 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.057% fail on Pedal
  - 0.057% fail on Hand lever
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.11% fail on Lever
- 0.057% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.057% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
1.1% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Springs (55% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Coil springs (55% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.52% fail on Coil spring
- 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.17% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.11% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.057% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.057% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.057% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.057% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.057% fail on Sub-frame
1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.98% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.92% fail on Spark ignition (95% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions
  - 0.057% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.23% fail on Fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
0.75% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.34% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.17% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Transmission
  - 0.057% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.057% fail on Joints
  - 0.057% fail on Belts
- 0.057% fail on Doors
  - 0.057% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.057% fail on Door condition
- 0.057% fail on Boot lid
  - 0.057% fail on Boot lid condition
0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.11% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.11% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.11% fail on Registration plates
0.11% fail on Steering
- 0.11% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.11% fail on Track rod end
0.057% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.057% fail on Belt(s)/padding
0.057% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.057% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Fiat Punto (2010 - 2018)
Low running costs thanks to economical engines. Impressive MultiAir petrols. Good levels of standard kit. Comes with a driver's knee airbag and five three point seatbelts.