MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Punto » 2015

FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2015
73.2% pass rate
from 2,570 tests in 2021
(39% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.7% fail on Visibility (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (54% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.039% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.039% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.039% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (68% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (60% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (65% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.23% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.078% fail on Horn
      • 0.039% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.039% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 5.9% fail on Suspension (83% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bar (34 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.078% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.039% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.039% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.039% fail on Sub-frame
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.66% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.74% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (98% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.039% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.31% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
      • 0.039% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.078% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.078% fail on Lever
    • 0.039% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.039% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.039% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.47% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.078% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition
      • 0.039% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.039% fail on Door condition
    • 0.078% fail on Seats
      • 0.078% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.039% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.039% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.039% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.039% fail on Pipe
    • 0.039% fail on Transmission
      • 0.039% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.039% fail on Joints
    • 0.039% fail on Body
      • 0.039% fail on Other body component
    • 0.039% fail on Load security
      • 0.039% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.039% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.039% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.039% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.039% fail on Undertray
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.039% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.039% fail on Steering play
      • 0.039% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.16% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.039% fail on Airbags
      • 0.039% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.078% fail on Condition
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Punto (2010 - 2018)
    Low running costs thanks to economical engines. Impressive MultiAir petrols. Good levels of standard kit. Comes with a driver's knee airbag and five three point seatbelts.

    Search Good Garages