FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2015
77.2% pass rate
from 2,613 tests in 2020
(49% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Visibility (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (97% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on View to rear
      • 0.077% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.038% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.038% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (80% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (56% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (52% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Position lamps (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.34% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.34% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on All direction indicators (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.27% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
      • 0.038% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.038% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (39% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.038% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.38% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.77% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.077% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.077% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.077% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.077% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.077% fail on Rbt
          • 0.077% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
      • 0.038% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.077% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.077% fail on Lever
    • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.038% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.5% fail on Suspension
    • 1.3% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.038% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage
    • 0.038% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.038% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 0.54% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.15% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.077% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.038% fail on Tank
      • 0.038% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.077% fail on Doors
      • 0.038% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
      • 0.038% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
    • 0.038% fail on Transmission
      • 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.038% fail on Joints
    • 0.038% fail on Body
      • 0.038% fail on Other body component
    • 0.038% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.038% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.31% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.038% fail on Airbags
      • 0.038% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.31% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.15% fail on Steering
    • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.038% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.077% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.077% fail on Attachment
  • 0.038% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.038% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Punto (2010 - 2018)
    Low running costs thanks to economical engines. Impressive MultiAir petrols. Good levels of standard kit. Comes with a driver's knee airbag and five three point seatbelts.

    Search Good Garages