FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.3% pass rate
from 8,571 tests in 2017
(30% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.023% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Dipswitch (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.093% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.082% fail on Battery
    • 0.070% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.023% fail on Lamp
      • 0.012% fail on Tell tale
  • 16% fail on Suspension (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Location
    • 3.6% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.070% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.058% fail on Presence (50 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on Drive shafts (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Front drive shafts (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Constant velocity joints (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.012% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension arms (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
      • 0.023% fail on Front (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.070% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.047% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.012% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.012% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.012% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.047% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.035% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.023% fail on Wheel cylinder (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (20% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Rear wheels (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.57% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.058% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.047% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.012% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.32% fail on ABS
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake control components (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Components (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
        • 0.035% fail on Pipes (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.035% fail on Leaks
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.023% fail on Cable
    • 0.023% fail on Restricted movement (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 2.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Cap
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.023% fail on Passengers airbag (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Requirements
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
  • 0.96% fail on Steering
    • 0.67% fail on Steering system
      • 0.47% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.047% fail on Free play
        • 0.047% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.035% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Operation
    • 0.082% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Steering control
      • 0.012% fail on Steering shaft
      • 0.012% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.012% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.012% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.55% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Doors (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.012% fail on Drivers
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Body security (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Engine mountings
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 0.34% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Punto (2010 - 2018)
    Low running costs thanks to economical engines. Impressive MultiAir petrols. Good levels of standard kit. Comes with a driver's knee airbag and five three point seatbelts.

    Search Good Garages