MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Punto » 2009

FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.5% pass rate
from 11,879 tests in 2020
(6.1% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension (4.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Springs (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Coil springs (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Coil spring (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (0.64% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar (21% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Suspension arm (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.61% fail on Sub-frames (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut (21% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Pins and bushes (7.2% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut (25% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3.6% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Other suspension component (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover (39% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.042% fail on Suspension rods (25% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint (0.91% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0084% fail on Axles
      • 0.0084% fail on Axle
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (7.2% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (18% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (10% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (10% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Dipswitch (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (54% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Switch
      • 0.0084% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0084% fail on Arm
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (9.1% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Electrical equipment (2.0% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn (16% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies) (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Electrical wiring (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Reversing lamps (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Reversing lamps (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Position lamp (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Hazard warning (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Switch (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (1.7% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Main beam tell-tale (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Non catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.017% fail on Catalytic converter (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.017% fail on Oxygen sensor (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.017% fail on NOx sensor (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0084% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.67% fail on Compression ignition (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Emissions not tested (26% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0084% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.53% fail on Fluid leaks (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Engine oil leaks (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Transmission oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.0084% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0084% fail on Undertray
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes (14% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance (7.2% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0084% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (37% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (25% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0084% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Parking brake performance (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake performance (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0084% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0084% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0084% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (40% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (39% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance (33% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Brake linings (6.1% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (9.1% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (9.3% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.21% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Cable (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Lever (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.69% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever (4.3% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system (14% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Electronic stability control (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic braking system (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Lever (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Rigid brake pipes (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Flexible brake hoses (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic systems (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Other components
    • 0.0084% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0084% fail on Servos
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (3.0% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (13% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition (13% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type (13% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Transmission (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Joints (49% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.0084% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.042% fail on Prop shafts (50% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Joints (49% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Tank (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Hose (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on System (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Doors (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Driver's door (10% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition (5.0% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Catch
      • 0.025% fail on Front passenger's door (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Door condition (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Bracket (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seats (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Driver's seat (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Passenger's seat (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers (12% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Body (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Other body component (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Panel (17% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Undertray (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Integral vehicle structure (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame condition (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.034% fail on Boot lid (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition (16% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Other boot lid component (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Chassis (9.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Chassis condition (26% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0084% fail on Cabs
      • 0.0084% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (8.0% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view (2.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Bonnet (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Condition of glass (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Windscreen (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Window
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0084% fail on Steering component
        • 0.0084% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.017% fail on Locking devices (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0084% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.16% fail on Electronic power steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear (50% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Steering play (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Steering rack (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Power steering (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Operation (25% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Other components (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0084% fail on Steering column
  • 0.80% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (13% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts (4.8% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Requirements (2.1% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0084% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0084% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle (8.7% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates (8.4% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.017% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Speedometer (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.0084% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0084% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages