FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.1% pass rate
from 11,458 tests in 2021
(9.7% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (7.3% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Springs (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Coil springs (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Coil spring (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.061% fail on Linkage (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.052% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0087% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.0087% fail on Axles
      • 0.0087% fail on Axle
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (13% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (14% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.061% fail on Headlamp levelling device (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Dipswitch (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0087% fail on Switch
      • 0.0087% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0087% fail on Arm
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.53% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.079% fail on Electrical wiring (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.026% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0087% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0087% fail on Switch
  • 9.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (27% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.035% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.026% fail on Other emission control equipment (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.0087% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.49% fail on Compression ignition (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.035% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.017% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.0087% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.026% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.93% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.017% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0087% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.0087% fail on Undertray
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes (12% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0087% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (35% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (35% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0087% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0087% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.026% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0087% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0087% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.096% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (18% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (31% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.0087% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Cable (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Lever
        • 0.0087% fail on Rod
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.061% fail on Electronic stability control (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Lever (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Rigid brake pipes (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.070% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.052% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.026% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.026% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0087% fail on Leaks
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0087% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.035% fail on Bonnet (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Transmission (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Drive shafts (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Joints (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.026% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.026% fail on Joints
      • 0.0087% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.63% fail on Doors (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0087% fail on Catch
      • 0.079% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Tank
      • 0.017% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0087% fail on System
    • 0.30% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Passenger's seat (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Bracket (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.087% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Sub-frame condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.079% fail on Body
      • 0.052% fail on Other body component
      • 0.026% fail on Panel
    • 0.052% fail on Undertray
    • 0.035% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.035% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.017% fail on Chassis
      • 0.017% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0087% fail on Load security
      • 0.0087% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.0087% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.017% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0087% fail on Other components
        • 0.0087% fail on Steering component
    • 0.21% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Power steering
      • 0.087% fail on Operation
    • 0.052% fail on Steering play
      • 0.052% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.017% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0087% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0087% fail on Motorcycle derived steering systems
      • 0.0087% fail on Head bearings
  • 0.90% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.59% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.052% fail on Requirements
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0087% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0087% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.0087% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.0087% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.0087% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0087% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages