FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.1% pass rate
from 12,156 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.033% fail on Presence (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Condition
      • 0.0082% fail on Attachment
    • 4.2% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Drive shafts (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Front drive shafts (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.0082% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.0082% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Rear
      • 0.074% fail on Front (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Tie bars/rods (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension arms (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.016% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.016% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.0082% fail on Condition
      • 0.0082% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0082% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0082% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.049% fail on Switch (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.099% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0082% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0082% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.025% fail on Switch
        • 0.0082% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Fog lamp (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Switch
    • 0.26% fail on Horn
    • 0.21% fail on Battery
    • 0.082% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.058% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.041% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.016% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.016% fail on Lamp
      • 0.0082% fail on Tell tale
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
    • 0.099% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0082% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.0082% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.72% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.37% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.0082% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.025% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on ABS
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.0082% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Components (64% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Hoses
        • 0.041% fail on Pipes (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.0082% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.016% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0082% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.0082% fail on Operation
    • 0.066% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.066% fail on Cable
    • 0.049% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.041% fail on Restricted movement (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.0082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0082% fail on Components
        • 0.0082% fail on Servos
    • 0.0082% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0082% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 4.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Cap (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on System
      • 0.016% fail on Hose
      • 0.0082% fail on Pipe
  • 1.0% fail on Steering
    • 0.70% fail on Steering system (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end (37% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.025% fail on Free play
        • 0.025% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0082% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0082% fail on Other components
        • 0.0082% fail on Steering component
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Steering control (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Steering lock (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Steering column
    • 0.082% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.81% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.36% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0082% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
      • 0.0082% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.39% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.058% fail on Requirements (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
  • 0.75% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers other (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0082% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.23% fail on Seats (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mountings (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Body security
    • 0.016% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.016% fail on Chassis
    • 0.0082% fail on Load security
      • 0.0082% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.45% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages