FIAT Punto MOT Results
Registered in 200960.1% pass rate
from 12,156 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Location (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.033% fail on Presence (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Condition
- 0.0082% fail on Attachment
-
4.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Front drive shafts
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.0082% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.0082% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.52% fail on
Front drive shafts
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Wheel bearings
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Rear
- 0.074% fail on Front (70% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Component mounting
-
0.016% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.016% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.016% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.0082% fail on Condition
- 0.0082% fail on Attachment
-
0.0082% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0082% fail on Condition
-
8.8% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(11% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Front lamps (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rear lamps (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.058% fail on All position lamps
- 0.049% fail on Switch (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.099% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0082% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.0082% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.0082% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (63% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.025% fail on Switch
- 0.0082% fail on Tell tales
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.63% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(37% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Fog lamp (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Switch
- 0.26% fail on Horn
- 0.21% fail on Battery
- 0.082% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.058% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.041% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.016% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.016% fail on Lamp
- 0.0082% fail on Tell tale
-
5.6% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
(15% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
- 0.099% fail on Valve stem
-
8.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(56% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Washers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0082% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.0082% fail on Bonnet
-
6.5% fail on
Brakes
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.72% fail on Front wheels
- 0.37% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0082% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
- 0.025% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.40% fail on
Service brake control components
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Condition
-
0.40% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.36% fail on ABS
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.0082% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.26% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Components
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Hoses
- 0.041% fail on Pipes (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0082% fail on Cylinders
- 0.016% fail on Leaks
- 0.0082% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.0082% fail on Operation
-
0.24% fail on
Components
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.066% fail on Cable
- 0.049% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.041% fail on Restricted movement (72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.0082% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.0082% fail on
Components
- 0.0082% fail on Servos
-
0.0082% fail on
Components
-
0.0082% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.0082% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.25% fail on Cap (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on System
- 0.016% fail on Hose
- 0.0082% fail on Pipe
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.70% fail on
Steering system
(34% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Track rod end (37% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
-
0.025% fail on
Free play
- 0.025% fail on Steering rack
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
- 0.016% fail on Drag link end
- 0.0082% fail on Steering arm
-
0.0082% fail on
Other components
- 0.0082% fail on Steering component
-
0.15% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Operation
-
0.11% fail on
Steering control
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Steering lock (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Steering column
- 0.082% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Locking devices
-
0.70% fail on
Steering system
(34% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(32% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.36% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.0082% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
- 0.0082% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.058% fail on Requirements (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.75% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(69% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
- 0.17% fail on Passengers other (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Drivers
- 0.0082% fail on Passengers front
-
0.23% fail on
Seats
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Drivers
- 0.12% fail on Body condition
- 0.11% fail on Engine mountings (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Body security
-
0.016% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.016% fail on Chassis
-
0.0082% fail on
Load security
- 0.0082% fail on Bootlid
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
-
0.45% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.45% fail on Registration plate
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment