MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Punto » 2006

FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 2006
49.6% pass rate
from 13,895 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (28% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Springs (73% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Coil springs (74% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Coil spring (74% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0072% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.0072% fail on Spring saddle
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (22% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (60% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint (72% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (58% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms (17% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (44% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Sub-frame (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0072% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (36% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.47% fail on Axles (76% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (92% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.0072% fail on Axle
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings (66% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut (90% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (98% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.058% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0072% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0072% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (42% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (25% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0072% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (62% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (62% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.036% fail on Switch
      • 0.0072% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0072% fail on Arm
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Electrical equipment (63% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Horn (66% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Battery(ies) (65% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.014% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0072% fail on Switch
    • 0.086% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.022% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.0072% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0072% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (88% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (90% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (38% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Non catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.014% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.014% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.69% fail on Compression ignition (50% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (44% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (88% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.029% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0072% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0072% fail on NOx sensor
    • 0.76% fail on Fluid leaks (93% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.043% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.029% fail on Sound deadening material (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Undertray
  • 12% fail on Brakes (6.2% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance (12% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (45% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.0072% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (27% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (27% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (22% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.050% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.022% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (34% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0072% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.058% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (42% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (41% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance (37% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested (41% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0072% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.014% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.55% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Lever
        • 0.0072% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (73% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control (35% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Lever (51% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (63% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Anti-lock braking system (60% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Electronic stability control (78% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Rigid brake pipes (86% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic systems (54% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Brake fluid (73% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.014% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.0072% fail on Valves
    • 0.043% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.029% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
    • 0.0072% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0072% fail on Leaks
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.0072% fail on Catch
      • 0.45% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.0072% fail on Catch
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (48% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (46% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.0072% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.043% fail on Prop shafts (78% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame condition (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (49% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Tank
      • 0.0072% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0072% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Engine mounting condition (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Bracket (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's seat (79% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Chassis
      • 0.22% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.079% fail on Other body component
      • 0.072% fail on Panel
      • 0.0072% fail on Body condition
    • 0.094% fail on Undertray
    • 0.079% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.072% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0072% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.022% fail on Load security
      • 0.014% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.014% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.0072% fail on Loading door
    • 0.022% fail on Cabs
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.014% fail on Floor
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility (32% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (59% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (12% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on View to rear (85% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors (85% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.0072% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.014% fail on Window
    • 0.079% fail on Bonnet (65% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Driver's view (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres (11% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth (19% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Steering (57% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components (57% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (67% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.022% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.014% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0072% fail on Other components
        • 0.0072% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.0072% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.0072% fail on Components
    • 0.50% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.058% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Electronic power steering (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0072% fail on Steering box
    • 0.050% fail on Steering coupling (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Universal joint (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Steering column
    • 0.022% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (25% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.75% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.058% fail on Requirements
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0072% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.55% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle (43% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates (42% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 0.0072% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.0072% fail on Doors
      • 0.0072% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.0072% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0072% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Punto (1999 - 2006)
    Better than the original Punto in almost every way. Excellent driving environment. Easy to get in and out of. Practical and inexpensive to run.

    Search Good Garages