FIAT Punto MOT Results
Registered in 200051.6% pass rate
from 370 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 8.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
-
3.5% fail on
Springs
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.5% fail on Coil spring
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Transmission
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.0% fail on Joints
-
0.27% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.27% fail on Joints
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.81% fail on
Chassis
- 0.81% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.81% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.54% fail on Tank
- 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.54% fail on
Engine mounting
(6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Engine mounting condition (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Seats
- 0.27% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.27% fail on
Body
- 0.27% fail on Other body component
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.27% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.27% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.27% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.27% fail on
Cabs
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 12% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.81% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.81% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.81% fail on Horn
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
-
0.54% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
- 0.27% fail on Window
-
0.27% fail on
View to rear
- 0.27% fail on Mirrors
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.81% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.6% fail on
Fluid leaks
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Other leaks
-
9.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.3% fail on
Brakes
(44% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.81% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.81% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.81% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.27% fail on Brake pads
-
0.27% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.27% fail on Brake discs
-
0.81% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
-
0.54% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.54% fail on Hand lever
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.54% fail on Lever
- 0.27% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
0.54% fail on
Power steering
- 0.54% fail on Operation
-
0.54% fail on
Steering play
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.27% fail on Universal joint
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.6% fail on Registration plates
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Punto (1999 - 2006)
Better than the original Punto in almost every way. Excellent driving environment. Easy to get in and out of. Practical and inexpensive to run.