FIAT Punto MOT Results
Registered in 199950.6% pass rate
from 174 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(95% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.57% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.57% fail on Brake pads
-
0.57% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.57% fail on Brake drums
-
0.57% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.57% fail on Cable
-
0.57% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.57% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.57% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(95% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
- 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.57% fail on Ball joint
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.9% fail on Coil spring
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.57% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.1% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.57% fail on Strengthening plate
-
4.0% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.57% fail on Tank
- 0.57% fail on Pipe
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
-
0.57% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.57% fail on Catch
-
0.57% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.57% fail on Door condition
-
0.57% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.57% fail on
Transmission
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.57% fail on Joints
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.57% fail on Floor
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.57% fail on Horn
-
0.57% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.57% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.57% fail on Position lamp
- 0.57% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
9.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Washers
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet
-
9.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.57% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.57% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.57% fail on Other leaks
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.0% fail on
Steering
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.57% fail on Rams
- 0.57% fail on Other components
-
1.1% fail on
Steering play
(9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Steering rack (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.57% fail on Steering rack
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.57% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.57% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Punto (1999 - 2006)
Better than the original Punto in almost every way. Excellent driving environment. Easy to get in and out of. Practical and inexpensive to run.