FIAT Punto MOT Results
Registered in 199946.1% pass rate
from 683 tests in 2017
(10% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps
- 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.59% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Fog lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Horn (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
0.44% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.15% fail on Lamp
- 0.15% fail on Switch
- 0.15% fail on Tell tale
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(22% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(48% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 5.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.1% fail on
Components
- 4.0% fail on Hoses (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pipes
- 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.29% fail on Leaks
- 0.15% fail on Operation
-
6.1% fail on
Components
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.59% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.59% fail on Condition
-
0.59% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.59% fail on Cable
- 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(48% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
7.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.4% fail on Component mounting
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
1.8% fail on
Radius arms
(10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(59% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(58% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(58% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.73% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
(69% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Condition (68% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.73% fail on Condition
-
0.59% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.59% fail on
Wheel bearings
(68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Front
- 0.29% fail on Rear
-
7.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 15% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(83% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
- 0.15% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
15% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(29% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Emissions
- 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pipe
- 0.15% fail on Cap
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.2% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
5.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.6% fail on Body condition
-
2.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Chassis
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
- 0.15% fail on Drivers
- 0.15% fail on Passengers other
- 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
-
4.7% fail on
Steering
-
4.1% fail on
Steering system
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
-
0.59% fail on
Power steering
- 0.15% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.15% fail on Operation
- 0.15% fail on Pump
- 0.15% fail on Other components
-
4.1% fail on
Steering system
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Punto (1999 - 2006)
Better than the original Punto in almost every way. Excellent driving environment. Easy to get in and out of. Practical and inexpensive to run.