FIAT Punto MOT Results
Registered in 199550.9% pass rate
from 216 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.93% fail on All position lamps (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Individual lamps
- 2.3% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.2% fail on Fog lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 1.4% fail on Battery
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.46% fail on Horn
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.3% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.46% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.2% fail on
Components
- 2.8% fail on Pipes
- 1.9% fail on Hoses
- 0.46% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.46% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.2% fail on
Components
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.46% fail on
Pedal
- 0.46% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.46% fail on
Pedal
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 9.3% fail on Exhaust system (91% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Pipe
- 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.3% fail on Wipers (96% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.46% fail on Mirrors
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(71% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Component mounting (82% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.93% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.93% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.93% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.46% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.46% fail on Location
-
0.46% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.46% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.46% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.46% fail on Front
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
-
10% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(100% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Condition
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.8% fail on Body condition
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Chassis
-
0.93% fail on
Doors
- 0.46% fail on Drivers
- 0.46% fail on Passengers other
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 0.93% fail on Size/type
-
1.9% fail on
Road Wheels
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
-
0.93% fail on
Steering system
- 0.93% fail on Track rod end
- 0.46% fail on Locking devices
-
0.93% fail on
Steering system
-
0.93% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.93% fail on Registration plate