FIAT Punto MOT Results

Registered in 1995
51.6% pass rate
from 95 tests in 2020
(30% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (67% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (80% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (51% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (69% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (76% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (62% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (79% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Cable (19 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (36% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (25% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (19% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (20% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (20% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (18% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (31% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission (15% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (1.4% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Joints (3.8% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition
  • 11% fail on Visibility (57% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (32% better than other 1995 cars)
  • 9.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (29% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Spark ignition (38% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (31% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (94% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (39% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
    • 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (28% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (92% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 3.2% fail on Steering (27% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear (75% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack (99% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering column
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages