FIAT Punto Evo MOT Results
Registered in 201260.2% pass rate
from 259 tests in 2021
(31% worse than other 2012 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto Evo is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(80% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Flashing type
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
-
8.9% fail on
Flashing type
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.39% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.39% fail on Battery(ies)
-
8.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
8.9% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.77% fail on
Macpherson strut
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.77% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.39% fail on Linkage
- 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
8.9% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Brakes
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
(180% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Hand lever
-
0.77% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.77% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.39% fail on Lever
-
0.39% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.39% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.39% fail on Brake discs
-
0.39% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
(180% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
-
5.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(140% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.39% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.39% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.39% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.39% fail on
Body
- 0.39% fail on Other body component
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
-
0.39% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.39% fail on Door condition
-
0.39% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.39% fail on
Seats
- 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.39% fail on Drag link end
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.77% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.39% fail on Condition
-
0.77% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.77% fail on Attachment