FIAT Punto Evo MOT Results

Registered in 2010

59.6% pass rate

from 1,764 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto Evo is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 5.8% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 5.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.1% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.057% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.74% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.057% fail on Switch
- 0.62% fail on Reversing lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.057% fail on Reversing lamp switch
- 0.34% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.28% fail on Horn
  - 0.057% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.23% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.23% fail on Position lamp
- 0.057% fail on Rear reflectors
13% fail on Suspension
- 7.8% fail on Springs (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 7.8% fail on Coil springs (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 7.8% fail on Coil spring (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (35% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.57% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.057% fail on Linkage
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.62% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.68% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.45% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.057% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.057% fail on Ball joint
- 0.057% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.057% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
7.4% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Washers (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.17% fail on View to rear
  - 0.17% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Driver's view (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.11% fail on Windscreen
6.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 6.1% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 2.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Compression ignition (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.057% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
6.3% fail on Brakes
- 3.3% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt
      - 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.74% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.57% fail on Rbt
      - 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.1% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.17% fail on Cable
    - 0.057% fail on Lever
- 0.51% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.51% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.11% fail on Lever
- 0.057% fail on Hand operated control valves
  - 0.057% fail on Attachment
- 0.057% fail on Rigid brake pipes
5.4% fail on Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
4.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.68% fail on Other passenger's door (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.68% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.11% fail on Door condition
- 0.57% fail on Transmission (64% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.51% fail on Joints (66% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.057% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.057% fail on Joints
- 0.34% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.34% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.11% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Seats
  - 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.057% fail on Body
  - 0.057% fail on Other body component
2.5% fail on Steering
- 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.23% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.17% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.057% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Power steering
  - 0.057% fail on Operation
- 0.057% fail on Steering column
- 0.057% fail on Steering play
  - 0.057% fail on Steering rack
1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Condition
  - 0.057% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.057% fail on Requirements
  - 0.057% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.85% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.057% fail on Airbags
  - 0.057% fail on Drivers airbag
0.28% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.23% fail on Registration plates