FIAT Punto Evo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.4% pass rate
from 1,716 tests in 2017
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto Evo is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Location
    • 5.1% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.17% fail on Rear
      • 0.12% fail on Front
    • 0.23% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension arms (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.058% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.058% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.058% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.058% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.058% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.058% fail on Battery
    • 0.058% fail on Horn
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.76% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.58% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.058% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.64% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.58% fail on Components
        • 0.35% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Pipes
        • 0.058% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.058% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.47% fail on ABS
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.058% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.058% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 1.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.82% fail on Emissions (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Requirements
  • 1.0% fail on Steering
    • 0.87% fail on Steering system
      • 0.76% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.058% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.058% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.058% fail on Steering control
      • 0.058% fail on Steering column
    • 0.058% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.058% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.47% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers
    • 0.058% fail on Body security
    • 0.058% fail on Body condition
  • 0.29% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.058% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.058% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages