MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Punto Evo » 2010

FIAT Punto Evo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.1% pass rate
from 1,946 tests in 2020
(17% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Punto Evo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.57% fail on Reversing lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Reversing lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.051% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.051% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.051% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Springs (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Coil springs (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Coil spring (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Mounting
      • 0.051% fail on Bonded suspension units
        • 0.051% fail on Bonded suspension unit
    • 4.3% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.57% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.051% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.051% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.051% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Non catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.051% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.46% fail on Compression ignition (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.051% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.051% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.46% fail on Fluid leaks (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Transmission oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.051% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.051% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.051% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.46% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.051% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.051% fail on Servos
    • 0.051% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 4.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Drive shafts (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Joints (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.051% fail on Pipe
    • 0.051% fail on Towbar
      • 0.051% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.051% fail on Body
      • 0.051% fail on Other body component
    • 0.051% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.051% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.051% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.26% fail on Electronic power steering (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.051% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.77% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.051% fail on Requirements
    • 0.051% fail on Airbags
      • 0.051% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages