FIAT Panda MOT Results
Registered in 201890.4% pass rate
from 2,707 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2018 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2018 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Panda is unusually good or bad.
-
3.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(35% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(67% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (70% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp
- 0.26% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.037% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.15% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.074% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.037% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.037% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.037% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.037% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.037% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.037% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.037% fail on Position lamp
-
0.037% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.037% fail on Horn
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(67% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
(49% better than other 2018 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Tread depth (57% better than other 2018 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Visibility
(55% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Washers
- 0.55% fail on Wipers (76% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.037% fail on Windscreen
-
1.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(4 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Doors
(37 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Other passenger's door
(68 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Door condition (69 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
(10 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.037% fail on Door condition
-
0.74% fail on
Other passenger's door
(68 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Transmission
-
0.11% fail on
Prop shafts
(38 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Prop shaft (409 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.074% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.074% fail on Joints
-
0.11% fail on
Prop shafts
(38 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.074% fail on Tank (59 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.074% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.89% fail on
Doors
(37 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Brakes
(57% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(61% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(16 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Cable (38 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.074% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(91% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Brake pads (91% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.22% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.074% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt
-
0.037% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.037% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.037% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.037% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.037% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.037% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.074% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.074% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.037% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.037% fail on Lever
-
0.37% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(61% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Suspension
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.074% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.037% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.037% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.15% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.11% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.074% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.037% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.037% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.037% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.11% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.074% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.074% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.074% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.074% fail on Registration plates
-
0.074% fail on
Steering
-
0.037% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.037% fail on Steering rack
-
0.037% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.037% fail on Track rod end
-
0.037% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.037% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.037% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.037% fail on Condition
-
0.037% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.037% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.037% fail on
Doors
- 0.037% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.037% fail on
Doors
-
0.037% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.037% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Panda (2012 on)
Cute looks. Surprisingly practical. Fantastic value for money. Really easy to drive.