MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Panda » 2016

FIAT Panda MOT Results

Registered in 2016
79.8% pass rate
from 4,921 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Panda is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.061% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.061% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.061% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamps (47% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.041% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.041% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.041% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.020% fail on Horn
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs and drums (66% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs (66% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake linings and pads (74% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Brake pads (74% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Cable (40 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Lever
    • 0.77% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.061% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.061% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.041% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.041% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.041% fail on Rbt
          • 0.041% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.020% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.061% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.061% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.041% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.041% fail on Lever
    • 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.041% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.041% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other passenger's door (61 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition (63 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Catch
      • 0.10% fail on Front passenger's door (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Driver's door (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Transmission
      • 0.081% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.061% fail on Joints
        • 0.020% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.081% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Prop shaft (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.020% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.041% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.020% fail on Body
      • 0.020% fail on Other body component
  • 1.8% fail on Suspension
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Springs (68% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Coil springs (68% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.061% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.061% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.041% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Axles
      • 0.020% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.020% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.87% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.65% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Compression ignition (76% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Steering
    • 0.26% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.020% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.020% fail on Steering play
      • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.020% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.26% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.061% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.10% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.10% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.081% fail on Condition
    • 0.020% fail on Attachment
  • 0.020% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.020% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages