MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Panda » 2015

FIAT Panda MOT Results

Registered in 2015
77.1% pass rate
from 8,021 tests in 2021
(14% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Panda is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (78% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.100% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.012% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.025% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.025% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.087% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (94% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp (34% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.100% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (59% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.025% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.025% fail on Horn
    • 0.037% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.037% fail on Position lamp
  • 3.6% fail on Suspension
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (66% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (24% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (24% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (24% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage
    • 0.087% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.050% fail on Suspension rods (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (23% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Brakes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs and drums (57% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Brake discs (57% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads (55% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Brake pads (55% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Cable (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.012% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.037% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.075% fail on Rbt
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.012% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.012% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.11% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.075% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.075% fail on Lever
    • 0.050% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.025% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (79% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.025% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.012% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.012% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Other passenger's door (37 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Door condition (38 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
    • 0.89% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Transmission
      • 0.19% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Prop shaft (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Bearing housing (20 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.100% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Body
      • 0.062% fail on Other body component
    • 0.025% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.025% fail on Seats
      • 0.025% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.012% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.012% fail on Tank
    • 0.012% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.012% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition (79% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Catalyst emissions (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Compression ignition (81% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.025% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.012% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.46% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.012% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.26% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.012% fail on Requirements
    • 0.062% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
    • 0.062% fail on Attachment
  • 0.050% fail on Identification of the vehicle (77% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Registration plates (77% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.012% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.012% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.012% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.012% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages