FIAT Panda MOT Results
Registered in 201279.1% pass rate
from 5,781 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Panda is unusually good or bad.
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension
(94% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Coil springs
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.22% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.035% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.017% fail on Attachment
-
0.31% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.10% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.035% fail on Front
- 0.017% fail on Rear
-
0.017% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
4.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
(15% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth (55% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.086% fail on Size/type
- 0.052% fail on Valve stem
-
5.2% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(36% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Stop lamp (33% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Position lamps
(56% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Front lamps (48% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Rear lamps (83% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Headlamps
(62% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Switch (20 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.31% fail on
Direction indicators
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Individual lamps (55% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (65% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Horn
- 0.069% fail on Battery
-
0.069% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Fog lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
- 0.017% fail on Bonnet
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
(42% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads (54% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Brake discs
- 0.017% fail on Brake back plates
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.62% fail on Front wheels (85% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.086% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.017% fail on Brake operation
-
0.21% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.14% fail on
Components
- 0.12% fail on Hoses
- 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.052% fail on Leaks
- 0.017% fail on Operation
-
0.14% fail on
Components
-
0.10% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.086% fail on
Mechanical components
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Cable (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.035% fail on ABS
-
0.017% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.017% fail on
Pedal
- 0.017% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.017% fail on
Pedal
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
(42% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(85% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Exhaust system (78% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.017% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.017% fail on Cap
-
0.21% fail on
Steering
-
0.21% fail on
Steering system
- 0.16% fail on Track rod end
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack
-
0.21% fail on
Steering system
-
0.21% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Requirements
-
0.086% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.086% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.17% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.12% fail on
Doors
- 0.069% fail on Passengers other
- 0.035% fail on Drivers
- 0.017% fail on Passengers front
-
0.035% fail on
Seats
- 0.017% fail on Passengers
- 0.017% fail on Drivers
- 0.017% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.12% fail on
Doors
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.086% fail on Condition
- 0.035% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Registration plate (72% better than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review