FIAT Panda MOT Results
Registered in 201163.4% pass rate
from 5,747 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Panda is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(30% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.035% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.035% fail on Linkage (82% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
(75% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(75% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring (76% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Mounting
- 0.052% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(75% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.052% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.035% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
-
0.10% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.070% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.017% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.070% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.017% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.035% fail on
Axles
- 0.035% fail on Axle (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Visibility
(51% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers
-
0.19% fail on
View to rear
- 0.17% fail on Mirrors
- 0.017% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.070% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.070% fail on Windscreen
-
7.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(31% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.087% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (68% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (36% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.26% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (33% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Headlamps
(66% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.37% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.33% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.017% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.24% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.24% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Electrical equipment
(62% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.035% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.035% fail on Horn (78% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.017% fail on Position lamp
- 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
(17% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth (56% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Size/type
-
6.2% fail on
Brakes
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.035% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.035% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.035% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.90% fail on
Parking brake performance
(54% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Rbt
(61% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance (71% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.90% fail on
Rbt
(61% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.017% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(24% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.017% fail on Brake linings
-
0.70% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(34% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Brake discs (33% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.070% fail on Cable
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (200% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.19% fail on Lever
-
0.087% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.052% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.035% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.070% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(73% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Hand lever
- 0.017% fail on Pedal
- 0.035% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.017% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.017% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.017% fail on Other components
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Transmission
(88% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.017% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.017% fail on Tank
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
-
0.14% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.035% fail on Bracket
-
0.017% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.017% fail on
Chassis
- 0.017% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.017% fail on
Body
- 0.017% fail on Other body component
-
0.017% fail on
Seats
- 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.017% fail on Passenger compartment
-
3.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(27% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(68% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.087% fail on
Compression ignition
(90% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.052% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (81% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(68% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Fluid leaks
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Other leaks
- 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(37% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Steering linkage components
(43% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Ball joint
- 0.017% fail on Drag link end
- 0.10% fail on Electronic power steering (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.087% fail on Steering rack
-
0.070% fail on
Steering play
- 0.070% fail on Steering rack
-
0.035% fail on
Power steering
- 0.035% fail on Operation
-
0.89% fail on
Steering linkage components
(43% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(70% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Requirements
- 0.017% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.052% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.17% fail on Registration plates (54% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.087% fail on
Road Wheels
(79% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Panda (2004 - 2012)
Space, comfort and practicality in an engaging, affordable package.