FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.0% pass rate
from 186 tests in 2017
(48% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Suspension arms (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 6.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 6.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Trailing arms (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.1% fail on Radius arms (60 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (63 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Rear (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Battery
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.4% fail on Condition
  • 10% fail on Brakes (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.54% fail on Leaks
    • 0.54% fail on ABS
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.54% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.54% fail on Washers
  • 1.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on System
  • 1.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.54% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.54% fail on Passengers front
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages