FIAT Multipla MOT Results
Registered in 200646.7% pass rate
from 338 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 2006 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Suspension
(100% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
-
9.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.7% fail on Condition
- 0.89% fail on Location (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(17 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (36 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Radius arms
(43 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (47 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Spring mounting
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Rear
- 0.30% fail on Front
- 0.59% fail on General condition (120 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.59% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.59% fail on Condition
-
0.30% fail on
Axles
- 0.30% fail on Axle beam
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.89% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.89% fail on Battery
- 0.59% fail on Electrical wiring (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Hazard warning
(7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Lamp
- 0.30% fail on Switch
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Fog lamp
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
- 0.89% fail on Brake pads
- 0.89% fail on Brake discs
- 0.30% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.2% fail on
Components
- 0.89% fail on Pipes
- 0.30% fail on Hoses
- 0.30% fail on Leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Components
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical components
(6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Restricted movement
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Tyres
- 8.3% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.30% fail on Size/type
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Tank
- 0.30% fail on Pipe
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.8% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Steering rack
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
- 0.30% fail on Rams
-
9.5% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.59% fail on Bonnet
- 0.30% fail on Mirrors
-
2.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
- 0.59% fail on Passengers other
- 0.30% fail on Drivers
- 0.30% fail on Passengers front
- 0.59% fail on Body condition
-
0.30% fail on
Seats
- 0.30% fail on Passengers
-
0.30% fail on
Load security
- 0.30% fail on Bootlid
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Multipla (2004 - 2010)
Better quality than original. Rides well. Strong MultiJet diesel engines.