FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2006
46.7% pass rate
from 338 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 2006 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 14% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 9.5% fail on Suspension arms (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.89% fail on Location (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Sub-frames (17 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (36 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Radius arms (43 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (47 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
      • 0.30% fail on Front
    • 0.59% fail on General condition (120 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.59% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Axles
      • 0.30% fail on Axle beam
  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.89% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.89% fail on Battery
    • 0.59% fail on Electrical wiring (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Hazard warning (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Fog lamp
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 0.89% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Components
        • 0.89% fail on Pipes
        • 0.30% fail on Hoses
      • 0.30% fail on Leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical components (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Tyres
    • 8.3% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
      • 0.30% fail on Pipe
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Rams
  • 9.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.59% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.59% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.30% fail on Drivers
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.59% fail on Body condition
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers
    • 0.30% fail on Load security
      • 0.30% fail on Bootlid
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages