MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Multipla » 2006

FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2006
46.0% pass rate
from 161 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 2006 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (56% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.0% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.62% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.62% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.62% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.62% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.62% fail on Cable
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.62% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.62% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 12% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Power steering
      • 0.62% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.9% fail on Bumpers (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
    • 0.62% fail on Chassis
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Pipe
    • 0.62% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.62% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
    • 0.62% fail on Cabs
      • 0.62% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.8% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 8.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages