MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Multipla » 2006

FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2006
47.8% pass rate
from 274 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2006 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (86% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.73% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (20 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Suspension arm
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.7% fail on Springs
      • 4.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.4% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.36% fail on Mounting
      • 0.36% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 21% fail on Brakes (71% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.5% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.73% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.73% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.36% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.36% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.73% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring (19 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.36% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 14% fail on Tyres (81% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.36% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Tank
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe
      • 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.36% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
      • 0.36% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
    • 0.36% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.36% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.36% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (77% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions (76% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.73% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Other leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.73% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.73% fail on View to rear
      • 0.73% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.36% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 6.2% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Airbags
      • 0.36% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages