FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2003
43.3% pass rate
from 157 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2003 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.64% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
    • 8.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Pins and bushes (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.64% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.5% fail on Springs
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.2% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.64% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.64% fail on Axles
      • 0.64% fail on Axle
    • 0.64% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.64% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.64% fail on Position lamp
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 7.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.64% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.64% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.9% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Pivot
      • 0.64% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.64% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.64% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.64% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.64% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.64% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 7.6% fail on Washers
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.4% fail on Transmission
      • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.4% fail on Joints
    • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
  • 9.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 7.0% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.0% fail on Steering
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages