FIAT Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 1999
64.2% pass rate
from 246 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt
          • 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.81% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.41% fail on Cable
        • 0.41% fail on Lever
    • 0.81% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.81% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.81% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.41% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.41% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.81% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.81% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.41% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.41% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 11% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.4% fail on Springs
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.41% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Axles
      • 0.41% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition
        • 9.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.81% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.81% fail on Catalytic converter (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.41% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.41% fail on Chassis
      • 0.41% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.41% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.41% fail on Tank
    • 0.41% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.41% fail on Floor
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Requirements
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Airbags
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.81% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.81% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.81% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages