MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » FIAT » Coupe » 1997

FIAT Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 1997
62.9% pass rate
from 221 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (66% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 9.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.90% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Lever
      • 0.90% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.90% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.90% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.90% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.90% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.45% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.90% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Rear reflectors (13 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.45% fail on Horn
    • 0.45% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.45% fail on Position lamp
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.90% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.90% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.45% fail on Axles
      • 0.45% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.45% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.45% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.45% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 8.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.90% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.90% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 0.90% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.90% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.90% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Tank
      • 0.45% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.45% fail on Cabs
      • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.45% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Operation
      • 0.45% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.90% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages