FIAT Cinquecento MOT Results

Registered in 1995
53.0% pass rate
from 83 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Cinquecento is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.6% fail on Headlamp aim (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Headlamp aim (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.4% fail on Horn
      • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
        • 1.2% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.4% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 8.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame
  • 9.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages