FIAT Bravo MOT Results
Registered in 201055.9% pass rate
from 880 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Bravo is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(49% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Ball joint (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(58% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
- 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.57% fail on
Axles
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.34% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
0.23% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Transmission
(80% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Joints (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Driver's door
(14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Door condition (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.80% fail on
Driver's door
(14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Engine mounting
(18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Engine mounting condition (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
-
0.34% fail on
Seats
- 0.34% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Bumpers
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(35% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.34% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.45% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.57% fail on Hand lever
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.34% fail on Lever
-
0.34% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.23% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
6.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Direction indicators
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.57% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.23% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
-
0.11% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.11% fail on Position lamp
-
7.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(90% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Other leaks
-
0.11% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.11% fail on Driver's view
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
(87% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.23% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Electronic power steering
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Requirements
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.57% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.45% fail on Registration plates
- 0.11% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Bravo (2007 - 2014)
Roomy cabin and big boot. Five-star Euro NCAP crash test rating. Excellent 1.4 T-Jet petrol. Strong MultiJet diesels.