FIAT Bravo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.9% pass rate
from 1,043 tests in 2020
(26% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Bravo is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.96% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Axles
      • 0.29% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.096% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.096% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.38% fail on Horn
      • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 11% fail on Brakes (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.096% fail on Cable
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.096% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.29% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.67% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.67% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.096% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.096% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Condition (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 9.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's door (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.096% fail on Door condition
    • 0.86% fail on Engine mounting (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Engine mounting condition (39 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Bracket
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.096% fail on System
    • 0.19% fail on Undertray
    • 0.096% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.096% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.096% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.86% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 0.38% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Bravo (2007 - 2014)
    Roomy cabin and big boot. Five-star Euro NCAP crash test rating. Excellent 1.4 T-Jet petrol. Strong MultiJet diesels.

    Search Good Garages