FIAT Bravo MOT Results
Registered in 200952.6% pass rate
from 2,089 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Bravo is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(43% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 12% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Coil springs
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(32% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.048% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.96% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.096% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.19% fail on
Axles
- 0.14% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.048% fail on Axle
-
0.096% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.048% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.096% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.048% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes
-
12% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(56% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.048% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(90% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Brake linings
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Cable (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
5.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.62% fail on Lever
-
0.38% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.34% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.29% fail on Hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.048% fail on Brake fluid
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.62% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.048% fail on All position lamps
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.048% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
-
0.096% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
(73% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Joints (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.19% fail on Door condition
-
0.57% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Fuel system
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Tank
-
0.48% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.048% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.048% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.34% fail on
Engine mounting
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Bracket
- 0.14% fail on Undertray
- 0.096% fail on Bumpers
-
0.096% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.096% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.048% fail on
Chassis
- 0.048% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.048% fail on
Body
- 0.048% fail on Other body component
-
0.048% fail on
Seats
- 0.048% fail on Passenger's seat
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(78% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
-
0.43% fail on
View to rear
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Mirrors (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
-
9.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Non catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.048% fail on Catalytic converter
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
6.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.048% fail on Other leaks
-
0.048% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.048% fail on Undertray
-
9.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
5.7% fail on
Steering
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint
-
0.29% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
- 0.096% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.048% fail on
Power steering
- 0.048% fail on Operation
-
0.048% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.048% fail on Universal joint
-
5.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.72% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.048% fail on Attachment
- 0.57% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.72% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.48% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.48% fail on Registration plates
-
0.34% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.048% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Bravo (2007 - 2014)
Roomy cabin and big boot. Five-star Euro NCAP crash test rating. Excellent 1.4 T-Jet petrol. Strong MultiJet diesels.