FIAT Bravo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.3% pass rate
from 2,495 tests in 2017
(33% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Bravo is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 14% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Location
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.040% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.60% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.56% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.32% fail on Front
      • 0.24% fail on Rear
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.080% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.040% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 0.040% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.040% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front lamps (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.040% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.56% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Flashing type (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on Individual lamps (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Battery
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.080% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.040% fail on Lamp
      • 0.040% fail on Switch
    • 0.080% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Brakes (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Hub components (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake calipers (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.44% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.040% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.96% fail on Parking brake (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.48% fail on Components
        • 0.40% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Pipes
        • 0.040% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.040% fail on Leaks
    • 0.28% fail on Mechanical components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on ABS
    • 0.12% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Condition (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.040% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.040% fail on Size/type
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Washers (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.080% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Cap
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering system
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Other components
        • 0.040% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.16% fail on Steering control (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering coupling (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Universal joint (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.040% fail on Power steering
      • 0.040% fail on Operation
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Drivers (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.080% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.28% fail on Engine mountings (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Body condition
    • 0.040% fail on Seats
      • 0.040% fail on Passengers
  • 0.68% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.36% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.36% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.040% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Bravo (2007 - 2014)
    Roomy cabin and big boot. Five-star Euro NCAP crash test rating. Excellent 1.4 T-Jet petrol. Strong MultiJet diesels.

    Search Good Garages