FIAT 500 MOT Results
Registered in 200957.1% pass rate
from 21,653 tests in 2021
(7.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT 500 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(11% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(96% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Pins and bushes (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.0092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 3.5% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (20% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (50% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (67% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0046% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.0046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0046% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.3% fail on
Springs
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0046% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.0046% fail on Torsion bar
-
0.0046% fail on
Bonded suspension units
- 0.0046% fail on Attachment bracket
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings (21% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Sub-frames
(30% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Sub-frame (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0092% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0046% fail on Ball joint
-
0.44% fail on
Other suspension component
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
- 0.079% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.20% fail on
Axles
- 0.18% fail on Axle (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (90% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0046% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.018% fail on
Suspension rods
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0092% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.0092% fail on Suspension unit
-
9.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(96% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(67% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0092% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(59% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
(58% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.065% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.018% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
(58% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0046% fail on Parking brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0092% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0092% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(21% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.032% fail on Brake linings
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.00% fail on Brake discs
- 0.065% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Lever
- 0.0046% fail on Linkage
- 0.0046% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.78% fail on
Parking brake control
(97% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Lever (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(36% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Hand lever (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Pedal
-
0.45% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.33% fail on Rigid brake pipes (66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Electronic stability control (71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.069% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0092% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.046% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.014% fail on Leaks
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Headlamp levelling device (73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0046% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp (10.0% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (16% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters (38% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Reversing lamps
(65% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.20% fail on
Electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Battery(ies) (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Horn (60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.083% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.083% fail on Position lamp
-
0.032% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.023% fail on Main beam tell-tale (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.0046% fail on Rear reflectors
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
-
6.2% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Washers (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
0.088% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.088% fail on Windscreen
- 0.028% fail on Bonnet (82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Driver's view
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
(8.1% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth (19% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(15% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Front passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Catch (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Driver's door
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Catch (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.065% fail on Door condition
-
0.54% fail on
Front passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Transmission
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0092% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.023% fail on
Prop shafts
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Joints (66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Fuel system
(51% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Pipe
- 0.014% fail on Hose
- 0.0046% fail on Tank
- 0.0046% fail on System
-
0.079% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.060% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.018% fail on Bracket
-
0.074% fail on
Boot lid
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Boot lid condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0046% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.065% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.037% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.028% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.028% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.046% fail on
Body
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Other body component (64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Panel
- 0.0046% fail on Body condition
-
0.046% fail on
Seats
- 0.023% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.023% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.032% fail on
Chassis
- 0.032% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.028% fail on Bumpers (78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(16% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(19% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(12% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (43% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.014% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0046% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.0046% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.0046% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.39% fail on
Compression ignition
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.065% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (91% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.018% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.0092% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.0046% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0046% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(12% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Fluid leaks
(37% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.046% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.018% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0046% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0046% fail on Sound deadening material
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(19% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint
- 0.014% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0046% fail on Steering arm
-
0.11% fail on
Steering gear
(66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Steering rack (68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0092% fail on Operation
- 0.051% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.037% fail on
Steering play
- 0.037% fail on Steering rack
-
0.014% fail on
Power steering
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Operation
- 0.0092% fail on Steering column
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.47% fail on Registration plates
-
0.45% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.018% fail on Attachment
- 0.0092% fail on Requirements
- 0.0046% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0092% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0092% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Road Wheels
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Condition
- 0.079% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0092% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.0092% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0092% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0092% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
0.0046% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.0046% fail on
Doors
- 0.0046% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.0046% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat 500 (2008 on)
Stylish and full of character. Really affordable to buy. Low running costs.