DS DS5 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
79.7% pass rate
from 587 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the DS DS5 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Joints (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Undertray
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.68% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.34% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 3.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.68% fail on Washers
  • 1.4% fail on Brakes
    • 0.68% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.68% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.68% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.51% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Electronic parking brake
  • 1.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.68% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.34% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.17% fail on Undertray
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.85% fail on Suspension
    • 0.51% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
  • 0.34% fail on Steering
    • 0.34% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.34% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • DS 5 (2012 - 2018)
    It’s different. Smart interior, particularly with the optional watch strap leather. Plenty of standard equipment.

    Search Good Garages