DS DS5 MOT Results
Registered in 201679.7% pass rate
from 587 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the DS DS5 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Transmission
(19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Joints (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Fuel system
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Tank
- 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.17% fail on Bumpers
-
0.17% fail on
Doors
-
0.17% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Undertray
-
4.4% fail on
Transmission
(19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
4.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.85% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.68% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.68% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.68% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.34% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.68% fail on Washers
-
1.4% fail on
Brakes
-
0.68% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.68% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.68% fail on Brake pads
-
0.68% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.51% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.17% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.68% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.68% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.34% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.17% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.17% fail on Undertray
-
0.17% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.68% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.85% fail on
Suspension
-
0.51% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.17% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
0.51% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.34% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.34% fail on
Steering
-
0.34% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.34% fail on Track rod end
-
0.34% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.17% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.17% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review
-
DS 5 (2012 - 2018)
It’s different. Smart interior, particularly with the optional watch strap leather. Plenty of standard equipment.