DS DS3 MOT Results
Registered in 201675.1% pass rate
from 12,243 tests in 2021
(54% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the DS DS3 is unusually good or bad.
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.033% fail on Windscreen
-
0.033% fail on
View to rear
- 0.033% fail on Mirrors
-
5.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(44% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Matched pair
- 0.0082% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(35% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (30% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.24% fail on
Reversing lamps
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Reversing lamp switch (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.082% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.15% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.090% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.049% fail on Horn
-
0.033% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.033% fail on Position lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
(18% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.049% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Transmission
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Joints (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Prop shafts
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Joints (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Body
- 0.041% fail on Other body component
- 0.0082% fail on Panel
- 0.049% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Bumpers
-
0.041% fail on
Seats
- 0.025% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.016% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.016% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0082% fail on Tank
- 0.0082% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.0082% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0082% fail on Bracket
-
0.0082% fail on
Doors
-
0.0082% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0082% fail on Door condition
-
0.0082% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
2.9% fail on
Transmission
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brakes
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(67% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.016% fail on Brake linings
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.83% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake performance
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
(57% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Service brake performance (65% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.016% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
(57% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.082% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.065% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.082% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.082% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.057% fail on
Rbt
- 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.057% fail on
Rbt
- 0.041% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake performance
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.065% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.065% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.065% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.033% fail on Pedal
- 0.033% fail on Hand lever
- 0.025% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.016% fail on
Parking brake control
(85% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Lever (83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.0082% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0082% fail on Brake fluid
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(67% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.2% fail on Coil spring
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.39% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0082% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.065% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.057% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0082% fail on Linkage
- 0.041% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0082% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.025% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
-
0.69% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.61% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.33% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0082% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0082% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.33% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.057% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.057% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.033% fail on
Noise suppression
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Undertray (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Sound deadening material
-
0.61% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.60% fail on
Steering
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Steering linkage components
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0082% fail on Steering arm
-
0.025% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.025% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0082% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.57% fail on
Steering linkage components
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.0082% fail on Requirements
- 0.041% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0082% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0082% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates
-
0.041% fail on
Seat belt installation check
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Belt(s)/padding (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
DS 3 (2010 - 2019)
High quality interior, great 1.6 THP 165 petrol engine with six-speed gearbox, wide engine range, drives and handles well.