MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Dodge » Journey » 2010

Dodge Journey MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.1% pass rate
from 586 tests in 2017
(37% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Dodge Journey is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.51% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.7% fail on Hub components (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.68% fail on ABS
    • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Tyres (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.9% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Valve stem (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.51% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.51% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
        • 0.17% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.34% fail on Steering control (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering wheel (73 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
  • 4.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.85% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Pipe (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on System
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment
  • 0.68% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.68% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.51% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages