Dodge Journey MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.5% pass rate
from 659 tests in 2020
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Dodge Journey is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Brake pads (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.91% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.61% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.30% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.61% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.76% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.15% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering linkage components (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
        • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering wheel
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Other passenger's door (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Airbags
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.91% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages