Dodge Journey MOT Results
Registered in 201060.1% pass rate
from 586 tests in 2017
(37% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Dodge Journey is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(60% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Position lamps
(170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.17% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.34% fail on
Headlamps
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Hazard warning
(8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Lamp
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.17% fail on Horn
-
7.8% fail on
Position lamps
(170% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Front wheels
- 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Brake operation
-
6.7% fail on
Hub components
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.68% fail on ABS
- 0.51% fail on Electronic stability system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.34% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Leaks
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(62% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 3.9% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.85% fail on Valve stem (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Suspension
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rear (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.51% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.51% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.51% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.34% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Steering
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Other components
- 0.17% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.34% fail on
Steering control
(18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Steering wheel (73 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation
-
0.17% fail on
Power steering
- 0.17% fail on Other components
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.0% fail on Washers
- 0.68% fail on Windscreen
-
0.85% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.34% fail on Pipe (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on System
- 0.34% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.68% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.68% fail on Attachment
-
0.68% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.34% fail on
Doors
- 0.34% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Seats
- 0.34% fail on Drivers (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Doors
-
0.68% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.68% fail on Registration plate
-
0.51% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.34% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review
-
Dodge Journey (2008 - 2010)
Chunky, SUV-like design with lower emissions than a 4x4 seven-seater and Getrag Powershift twin-clutch auto option.