MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Dodge » Journey » 2010

Dodge Journey MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.7% pass rate
from 581 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Dodge Journey is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.34% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.69% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.34% fail on Horn
    • 0.17% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 17% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Valves (51 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Servos
  • 10.0% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.17% fail on Steering column
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
    • 1.0% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.34% fail on Engine mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.17% fail on Bracket
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.69% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages