Dodge Journey MOT Results

Registered in 2009
55.1% pass rate
from 737 tests in 2017
(38% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Dodge Journey is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.27% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Battery
  • 15% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake operation (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Hub components (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.81% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
        • 0.27% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Front suspension joints (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.54% fail on Front
      • 0.54% fail on Rear
    • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.54% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.54% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.14% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 7.6% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Steering system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Free play
        • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Rams
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers airbag (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on System
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Emissions
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.54% fail on Passengers other (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Engine mountings
  • 0.14% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages