Dodge Journey MOT Results

Registered in 2009

51.4% pass rate

from 622 tests in 2021

(28% worse than other 2009 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Dodge Journey is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 13% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 10% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.80% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.32% fail on Linkage
- 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Other suspension component (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Ball joint (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.48% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
19% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 8.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 8.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 6.1% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 3.9% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      - 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    - 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.80% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.80% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
- 6.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.1% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.16% fail on Cable
- 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.96% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Electronic braking system
- 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.16% fail on Hand lever
- 0.16% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.16% fail on Valves
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.8% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.96% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.4% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.64% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.48% fail on Horn
  - 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.16% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.16% fail on Position lamp
10% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 10% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 9.3% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.16% fail on Locking devices
- 0.48% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.48% fail on Steering rack
- 0.32% fail on Steering play
  - 0.32% fail on Steering rack
- 0.16% fail on Power steering
  - 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
7.4% fail on Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.32% fail on Windscreen
- 0.16% fail on Bonnet
6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.9% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Other passenger's door (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.9% fail on Door condition (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Transmission
  - 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
    - 1.3% fail on Joints
  - 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.16% fail on Joints
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.96% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Pipe
- 0.48% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Driver's seat (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.16% fail on Bracket
- 0.16% fail on Body
  - 0.16% fail on Other body component
- 0.16% fail on Undertray
6.3% fail on Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 3.9% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 3.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    - 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.96% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.16% fail on Other leaks
- 0.16% fail on Noise suppression
  - 0.16% fail on Undertray
3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.32% fail on Condition
0.96% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.96% fail on Attachment
0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.80% fail on Registration plates